Back Open link
Reader View

SpaceX Joins the Nasdaq-100. Has the Index Become Too Risky to Track?

www.nasdaq.com

Written by David Jagielski for The Motley Fool->

The Nasdaq-100 includes the largest non-financial companies on the Nasdaq exchange.

Now that SpaceX is part of the index, it's looking even more expensive.

Investing in index funds has long been viewed as a safe way to invest in the stock market. They can give you broad exposure to a wide range of stocks and help you diversify. One of the most popular ones on the Nasdaq exchange is the Nasdaq-100, which includes the top 100 non-financial stocks.

But with Space Exploration Technologies Corp (NASDAQ: SPCX), also known as SpaceX, recently joining the index, is that still a good one to track?

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Tracking indexes can be ideal for passive investors who just want to buy and forget about their investments. But because indexes can change over time and rebalance, investors may not realize all of the stocks they have exposure to. And the Nasdaq-100 has gotten a bit riskier recently with the addition of SpaceX.

While SpaceX is a popular growth stock with retail investors, the company itself is unprofitable, incurring billions in losses, and that trend may not end soon as it invests heavily in space and artificial intelligence (AI). Meanwhile, with a market cap of close to $2 trillion, it's trading as if it were a highly successful, profitable business, as is the case with other stocks at this type of valuation. Its high valuation makes it vulnerable to a significant correction once the hype and excitement wear off, and that could drag down investments that track the Nasdaq-100, such as the highly popular Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ).

Tracking the top stocks on the Nasdaq hasn't been a bad move for investors over the years, as the Invesco QQQ Trust has doubled in a span of five years, while the S&P 500 has risen by a more modest rate of about 72% over that time frame.

But that has been amid a flurry of excitement around AI in recent years, sending stocks to massive valuations in the process. That means many Nasdaq-100 stocks are going to be incredibly expensive right now, not just SpaceX. I wouldn't consider tracking the index, despite its impressive gains in recent years, because over the next five years returns could look very different, and possibly even negative, given how highly valued many Nasdaq stocks are these days.

While it may be tempting to look at past results, they can give investors a false sense of security. With SpaceX and many other expensive stocks in the Nasdaq-100, a better move may be to track the S&P 500 or simply focus on more value-oriented stocks.

Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $398,160!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,249,202!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 918% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

*Stock Advisor returns as of July 14, 2026.

David Jagielski, CPA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Nasdaq. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

This data feed is not available at this time.