The 2026 Intern’s Guide to ETFs

Our recent intern guides covered how markets work and how trading works. Today, we switch to an important part of the stock market ecosystem: Exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

ETFs are one of the most successful financial innovations of the last 30 years. Since their launch (in Canada) in 1990, ETFs have proliferated and their assets have grown around the world. According to ETFGI, in the U.S., there are now over 5,000 ETFs (right axis, open circles) with assets totaling over $15 trillion (left axis, bars).

Chart 1a: ETF asset growth from 2003 to May 2026

Interestingly, a lot of the growth in ETFs has roughly offset the mutual funds net outflows. Although, we note that this is not the same as index funds growing at the expense of active funds (as we discuss later).

Chart 1b: ETF asset growth vs. mutual funds

ETF stands for exchange-traded fund. That makes an ETF both a managed fund and a stock!

So, when you see an ETF ticker, like QQQ for the Nasdaq-100 ETF, remember it represents a managed portfolio of securities, as well as a stock you can trade yourself.

Chart 2: An ETF like the QQQ is a fund that holds the top 100 stocks in the Nasdaq-100 Index®

Most ETFs are legally structured and managed as a mutual fund, following the rules of the 1940 Act. Like other mutual funds, an ETF is a professionally managed portfolio that holds a diversified group of stocks. Many (but not all) are also index funds, which means their portfolio managers hold almost all stocks in the index but do very little trading.

A key difference between mutual funds and ETFs is when and how an investor buys the fund:

Some of you may have noticed in Chart 1a that there's a small additional category called “ETPs” and wondered what that was.

There are other differences in how ETPs are structured, too. Some hold cash and futures or physical commodities, often to track commodities (like: IBIT, iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF). These are generally regulated under the 1933 Securities Act, which regulates new security issuance, but not how investments within them are managed.

Today, to keep things simple, we’ll use the term ETF.

Early ETFs were exclusively index funds. SPY, the S&P 500 index ETF, was the first to launch in the U.S. It was followed by Select Sector funds like XLE (Energy) and XLK (Technology), which also follow S&P indexes. In the 1990s, there were also tradable country index funds run by banks that later became some of the earliest iShares country funds.

Over time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) closed the gap between classic stock selection (active) funds like mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs; first, with ETFs tracking smart beta indexes and transparent active ETFs. Finally, non-transparent active ETFs were introduced, allowing the stock-picker to keep some of their stock picks secret, while still publishing enough information to make arbitrage and market making possible.

Chart 3: Evolution of different ETFs, as the SEC closed the gap between index ETFs and active mutual funds

These days many ETFs are not market-cap weighted; some are actively picking stocks, and others mirror the portfolios of established active mutual funds. ETFs let you buy bonds, international stocks, options and even commodity exposures – all using a stock brokerage account.

Just because an ETF is a U.S.-listed stock doesn’t mean that it offers investors U.S. stock exposures. In fact, many ETFs have no U.S. stock exposure at all.

Chart 4: ETF liquidity is spread across many different dimensions

There are even ETFs with exposure that combines stocks and options. There are also ETFs that focus on different company sizes and styles. Some of the newest ETFs also offer a portfolio of stocks that represent some popular themes.

Net asset value (NAV) is the value of the ETF portfolio per ETF share.

It sounds relatively simple to calculate – you just add up the:

You could think of it as the price you should pay for the ETF, except that’s not always true!

That’s usually because the stocks in the portfolio are not trading at the exact same time as the ETF. In those instances, the portfolio includes some old (or “stale”) prices.

In some cases, the time delay between markets can be large, and intraday NAVs are just a guide to the ETF’s current value. For example:

Even when those NAV timing differences are large, it can help to look at how the ETFs track their underlying portfolios over longer periods.

The data mostly shows that ETF portfolio managers are very good at replicating their target index. For example, when we look at the performance of the QQQ ETF versus the Nasdaq-100 Index (its benchmark), we see it completely overlaps over a period of more than a decade.

Chart 5: ETFs track target portfolios very well

As a group, ETFs trade over $234 billion every day.

Although, the U.S. market actually trades much more than that — Company stocks in the U.S. market trade, which is closer to $589 billion each day and the U.S. futures markets trades even more equity exposure, adding up to around $848 billion each day. However, we should highlight that futures trading is mostly concentrated on the single S&P 500 exposure.

Chart 6: ETF trading and creations versus stock and futures trading

ETFs allow for a much greater variety of hedges than futures. But compared to stocks, they also offer diversification in a single trade.

Some ETFs trade a lot, often without much impact on the underlying stocks. In fact, the value of creations and redemptions is a fraction of the value of ETF trading (just 3%). That seems to confirm that often an ETF buyer trades directly with an ETF seller – and little underlying stock arbitrage is needed.

We know from recent research that retail investors like buying ETFs, with around 81% of their net buying going into ETFs. However, the same research shows that retail trading contributes to less than 6.4% of all trading each day in ETFs.

Chart 7: Retail love ETFs; data suggests retail is just 5% of daily liquidity

It would seem that mutual funds are not large traders of ETFs either, as ETFs rarely show up in mutual fund 13F holdings.

That most likely means ETFs are heavily traded by hedge funds, banks and market makers. That’s a testament to their low trading costs, providing effective hedging of more customized exposures than futures. It is also supported by the fact that the 100 most liquid ETFs make up 65.2% of all ETF trading, despite being just 2% of all ETFs.

Chart 8: Many ETFs trade with spreads much cheaper than the underlying portfolio

That makes sense when you look at the spread of many ETFs, which are a fraction of the spread on the underlying stocks. That makes trading ETFs often cheaper than trading the underlying basket of stocks.

Not all ETFs are actively traded. However, we found that even thinly traded ETFs often have tight ETF spreads that accurately track NAV.

That’s a sign that the market makers are competitively pricing the ETF even if trades don’t occur. It's helped by ETF listing exchanges, like Nasdaq, that invest a lot in ETF liquidity programs, including using rebates and market tiers, to support market makers in quoting thinly traded products tightly.

It’s important for investors that the ETF price tracks its benchmark index.

With futures and options, market makers know that at expiry, their long and short positions will collapse, and profits will be locked in. However, that requires arbitrageurs to hold (sometimes large) positions for weeks or even months. That adds to the financing costs and risks while waiting for expiry, which will be factored into futures prices. It can also result in persistent premiums or discounts.

In contrast, the creation and redemption mechanism of ETFs allows an arbitrageur to lock in profits and reduce their positions any night they choose.

We have talked about the ETF NAV, which is typically measured using last trade prices.

However, arbitrage requires a market maker to cross both spreads (stock and ETF ticker), so bid and offer NAVs need to be calculated.

Chart 9: How arbitrageurs look at ETF valuation

Chart 10: Arbitrage is triggered when both spreads can be crossed profitably

Doing this trading stops the ETF from dislocating further from the portfolio NAV, keeping prices of the ETF and the NAV in-line.

Once the redemption arbitrage trade above is completed, the arbitrager will be long on the ETF and short the basket of stocks. The arbitrageur will have an almost perfect hedge, so market movements won’t change their profits. But there are other costs they may need to pay, from the cost of borrowing shorted stocks to the settlement fees from all of the trades.

Creations and redemptions make arbitrage even cheaper. They allow arbitrageurs to reduce their long and short positions, reducing the financing and stock borrowing costs we noted above.

In order for ETFs to be created and redeemed every day, the SEC has specific exemptions from the trading rules in the Exchange Act of 1934. Some of the trading rules were designed to apply to companies, like rules around new share issues and accounting data when a company raises new cash raises. Exemptions from these allow the ETF to “issue new shares” any day they need.

How they work is any Authorized Participant (someone approved by the ETF manager) can send their ETF back to the ETF manager and, in return, the ETF manager will send them all the underlying stocks in the basket (or vice-versa) any night, for a small fee.

If we start from the arbitrage trade in Chart 10, we can show how this works ahead of trades being settled (Chart 11):

Chart 11: ETF redemption mechanism (three steps to net out your hedged positions)

The arbitraged position involved a short stock and a long ETF position (Chart 11, Step 1). Because this is perfectly hedged, additional market movements won’t affect profits, so there is no market risk.

In a redemption, the arbitrageur gives the long ETF back to the ETF manager, and the ETF manager gives the arbitrageur the underlying shares from the portfolio in return.

The effect of this is shown in the grey box below (Chart 11, Step 2), where effectively the ETF shares are exchanged for real stocks.

That leaves the arbitrageur with long and short stock positions in the same shares that net to zero, requiring no shares to be delivered on settlement (Chart 11, Step 3). This reduces the balance sheet costs of arbitrage to zero and eliminates the need to borrow stock to hold the short position.

However, the arbitrageur does have some additional costs they need to account for that range from almost nothing to thousands of dollars:

Redemptions do represent net outflows from the ETF. However, the selling of stocks occurs during the day, by the arbitrageur, as a result of excess ETF selling. Importantly, the ETF portfolio manager sees no cash flows and does no trading.

Creation and redemption trades are likely to happen less than you think. They add up to just 3.5% of all ETF trading, and sometimes market-makers will redeem SPY to create VOO if they are doing S&P 500 arbitrage. That’s consistent with the fact that Chart 8 shows that ETFs are often cheaper to buy and sell than the portfolio of stocks themselves.

A number of other studies find that less than 10% of ETF trading likely flows through to underlying company stocks.

In short, it’s unlikely that ETF trading (on its own) impacts stocks returns or volatility much at all.

ETFs allow investors to buy diversified and professionally managed exposures to all sorts of assets. Data shows they track underlying portfolios extremely well, thanks to good portfolio management, efficient arbitrage and the creation-redemption mechanism.

Spreads are also generally cheap — often cheaper than buying a basket of underlying stocks — thanks to an efficient network of market makers.

That makes ETFs a cheap and efficient tool for investors that also minimizes stock-specific risks.

In short, ETFs are good for investors, and they know it.

Get market insights and analysis from Nasdaq Chief Economist Phil Mackintosh straight to your inbox

This data feed is not available at this time.