Back Open link
Reader View

Samsung's retail investors seek extra shareholder meeting over buybacks, bonuses

finance.yahoo.com · Tue, August 4, 2026 at 4:54 PM GMT+8

SEOUL, Aug 4 (Reuters) - South Korean retail shareholder platform ACT said on Tuesday it had launched a campaign to call an extraordinary ‌shareholders' meeting at Samsung Electronics, urging the chipmaker to buy back about $32 ‌billion worth of shares and set limits on performance bonuses.

ACT said it would begin collecting electronic ​signatures from shareholders at 5 p.m. local time and seek support from the National Pension Service and domestic and overseas asset managers to meet the 3% ownership threshold required to call the meeting.

The move comes after Samsung shares lost over ‌one third of their value ⁠since hitting record-highs in June, despite the artificial intelligence boom. The falls were driven by a sharp wave of deleveraging ⁠and renewed skepticism regarding the durability of AI infrastructure spending.

"This is not simply an expression of dissatisfaction over a falling share price. We are asking a basic capital-market ​question: ​who really owns a corporation?," it said ​in a statement, saying the campaign ‌aims to help the company become a shareholder-friendly company.

"Retail shareholders are like a company's fan club: they praise it when it performs well and take out the stick when it does not," it said.

The proposed meeting could consider a proposal to approve a 45.5 trillion won ($31.79 billion) share buyback programme, it said.

A ‌second proposal would seek to require shareholder ​approval for an upper limit on performance bonuses ​tied to company operating profit.

In ​May, Samsung agreed to assign 10.5% of operating profit for ‌special bonuses for chip division employees as ​part of a ​wage deal that averted a major strike.

ACT said such bonuses could amount to hundreds of billions of dollars over a decade, and argued that ​rules governing payouts of ‌that scale should not be set solely by the board.

Samsung Electronics ​did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

(Reporting ​by Hyunjoo Jin; Editing by Saad Sayeed)